Thursday, December 16, 2010

The Speech That Closed the United Nations

I had a dream last night that I heard this speech from an American president. Not the current one, but the next incumbent.



The Speech that Closed the U.N.
by Frank Hilliard

Mr. Vice President, Members of the Supreme Court, Members of Congress, ladies and gentlemen.

We have arrived at a turning point in history, both the history of these United States and that of the World. A noble experiment which began in San Francisco in 1945 will today come to an end in Washington in 2013. Between these two dates and these two cities lies the wreckage of a dream of world peace through dialogue, of the community of nations, indeed of the ability of countries to put global interests above self-interests.

What we have done in a little over half a century is to prove that wishful thinking leads to death and destruction, that good intentions are no substitute for realistic action, that equality of opportunity does not create equality of outcomes.

I have a number of announcements to make that I know you've been waiting to hear, so I will make them now and then give you the reasons. It is a lamentable tale of death, waste, blood and tears, but I promise you it will give you hope for the future.

So here they are . . . The United States will today withdraw from the United Nations as a member of the Security Council, as a member state, and as a member of its boards and commissions. The United States is revoking the diplomatic status of delegates to the United Nations and ordering them to leave the country within 48 hours. The United States is withdrawing permission for the United Nations to hold meetings or conduct business in the United States and to occupy its current building in New York.

The United States is withdrawing all funding from the United Nations and is seeking to block or freeze funds already issued in an effort to recapture them. The United States is declaring the Secretary General of the United Nations persona non grata and is deporting him from this country as I speak.

And finally, something I know Mayor Bloomberg will appreciate, the United States is revoking diplomatic licence plates issued to United Nations personnel and thus their ability to thumb their noses at New York parking restrictions. (applause)

Why has my administration taken these steps?

The simple answer is because we had to. We had to act to end the malignant influence of a body that has been ineffectual in the face of genocide, a body that has been incapable of policing itself much less its members, a body that has failed to stop the proliferation of atomic weapons and finally a body that has actively worsened the most long standing of the world's many problems.

Let me take these issues in reverse order, that of the refugees from the Arab-Israeli war of 1947.  Much of the responsibility for these unfortunates lies with the Arab countries that attacked Israel after it declared its independence. While Israel took in Jewish refugees from the neighbouring states, they refused to accept Arab refugees from Israel. That was serious enough, but the U.N. worsened the situation by declaring that all the children of these refugees were also refugees; a unique decision not implemented anywhere else on the planet. This decision, and the billions on dollars since spent on the Palestinians, has perpetuated and exacerbated the problem to the present day.

Well, enough of that; enough of paying the enemies of our friends to afford the weapons used to attack them. Enough of paying lip service to peace while actively funding a war.

The United States today calls on Egypt to accept the population of Gaza as Egyptian citizens and Jordan to accept residents of the West Bank as Jordanian citizens. It further calls on Israel and Jordan to establish a border between themselves that provides the new Jordanian residents with sufficient land to develop and Israel with sufficient land to establish a defensible border.

We believe that by withdrawing funding from the Palestinian Authority and from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency we will create the necessary conditions for those involved to seek and find economic, political and practical solutions for themselves. Since our money has helped prolong the problem, perhaps the lack of our money will help solve it.

On the second issue, that of proliferation of atomic weapons, the United States hereby gives notice to the Islamic Republic of Iran that it can either stop processing nuclear materials and developing nuclear weapons, or we will destroy them ourselves. Iran has 48 hours to provide access to all its nuclear facilities, to televise the equipment in a stopped condition and to issue an undertaking to destroy them.

The same message is currently being conveyed to the rulers of North Korea.

Let me be clear; those that 'take the sword' shall die by the sword if that is their wish and intent. The United States, unlike the United Nations, is not prepared to stand idly by while rogue regimes arm themselves with weapons of mass destruction. (prolonged applause)

On the third point, self-policing. We found out, to our cost the U.N. Oil-for-Food program in Iraq was a  colossal scam in which United Nations officials profited personally along with the dictator the program was designed to censure. While the most egregious example, there have been numerous other cases of the organization failing to police itself, including the cases of U.N. peacekeepers accused of rape in Sierra Leone and of causing cholera in Haiti.

Enough is enough; the waste at the top, the incompetence at the bottom, it is all of it stamped with the bright red imprint of failure.

And finally, genocide. If ever there was one shining hope for the world body it was that it would end genocide. Instead we saw genocides in Cambodia, in Bosnia and in Rwanda. In Rwanda, in particular, the United Nations, which had troops in the national capital, failed to give orders to arrest the perpetrators when it still had time to do so. Once the real blood-letting began, it sat passively while 800,000 innocent people perished.

The truth is, when it came to its main mandate, the U.N. failed. It failed its founders, it failed its members and it, most of all, failed the people who relied on it around the world. Failure should have consequences, and today, here, before you, I am providing them. (applause)

So where do we go from here?

I think the first thing we need to do is to go back to first principles, in this case the principle of mutual interests. For indeed, among the major powers, there are mutual interests. We, none of us, want war, want social and political dislocation across the world, or want to re-order international boundaries. We have shared interests in economic development, world trade, in peaceful relations.

This is why the United States has been in touch with the Government of Switzerland and asked it to be the permanent host of the Group of Twenty. We have offered to offset some of the costs of annual meetings in Geneva and Switzerland is considering our proposal. Our intention is to transfer our international obligations from the U.N. to the secretariat of the Group of Twenty as soon as this is practicable.

Before I conclude, I have a word of warning to leaders of countries in the Muslim world. There may be demonstrations and attacks on foreign nationals as a result of these decisions I have announced today. I want you to know that the United States will hold responsible the leaders of any country in which American or Western citizens are hurt or killed in the days ahead.

I am not speaking theoretically. I mean you personally will be held responsible for any deaths in your country.

You, and the world, will see in the next 48 hours what the United States means by the phrase 'will be held responsible'.

Finally, to you all, and to all Americans, I pledge to you that the dark days of the past are over. You will never again be asked to pay for your own destruction or the destruction of your country. From here forward, the United States will be the city on the hill, the beacon for mankind, it was always meant to be.

Be of good cheer and have a brave heart; this in the new beginning you voted for. God bless you and God bless the United States of America.

(prolonged applause)

12 comments:

Bob Devine said...

We should be so lucky!

Van Grungy said...

One small quibble...

There was no genocide in Bosnia...

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/bosnia_militant_islam/

Frank Hilliard said...

Sadly, I'm afraid there was. Have you forgotten Srebrenica?

ward said...

First time by your blog. Came by from a link at FFF.

Great piece.

Van Grungy said...

Sadly, you believe a wikipedia article..

Heh.. you have bought that narrative hook line and sinker..

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/08/canadian-pm-steven-harper-leader-of-the-free-world-vetoes-bosnian-lie-resolution.html

Go on and read some more... While you are at it read the Team B report on Shariah in America...

Did you know America has been extra friendly to muslims over Christians since WW2.. Eisenhower kicked off the the islam embrace..

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB78/docs.htm

Ever notice nobody talks about the whole muslim SS Army in Bosnia? Gee, what ever happened to them?

America's muslim love is really in high gear under Obama
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/12/obama-administration-worked-to-empower-muslims-in-uk.html

===

I'm still quibbling...

Kaffir_Kanuck said...

Outstanding. I'd be the first to take down my UN medal if it were so.

Anonymous said...

You left off the Speaker's announcement which precedes the speech:
"...honored (sic) guests, ladies and gentlemen, I give the forty-fifth President of these United States, Mr. John Bolton!"


'Cause I think the he is the ONLY person who could rationally be viewed as a candidate who might give just this speech.

No matter how "necessary and proper" that exact speech IS.

I *can* imagine Stephen Harper saying, the next day, "I personally concur in the President's assessment of the nature of the UN and of its manifest failures. The Cabinet will consider this issue at the earliest opportunity and will likely also concur. We have ignored what was perfectly plain and obvious for too long."

Iggy's head will pop. Jack's voice will fail from screaming.

A consummation devoutly to be wished!

Pete E said...

"I am not speaking theoretically. I mean you personally will be held responsible for any deaths in your country."

Am I to understand you want your hypothetical president to go to war against every country that fails to prevent attacks on American citizens in the month or two following this speech?
If I ran Al Quaeda, I could work that to my advantage: find some way to attack an American in 10-20 countries friendly or ambivalent to the US. Combine that with the wars that Iran and N. Korea would need to provoke shortly afterward and the US would soon be in hostilities of a WWII scale. (That is, WWII Germany, not WWII US.)

ib said...

Now that's my idea of the perfect speech. From your lips to God's ears and may I live long enough to see something like this. Bravo!

Anonymous said...

Here's a suggestion that would accomplish the same thing: supply the UN, a monopoly, with competition.
For a few million dollars, we could establish a "dinner club" in Manhattan, where reps from civilization-friendly nations could get together and schmooze informally. Call it a League Of Civilized Nations. Israel would be in, Venezuela would be out. Denmark in, Iran out. Japan in, North Korea out. Start with a few nations, and have the club members vet any new members. The UN would rapidly become irrelevant, and the bad guys would be resentful and wanting in to the new "club" --which would not happen until they mended their ways. Call it the "reverse Groucho principle". (Remember Groucho's quip that he wouldn't want to join any club that would have him as a member).
I think this could work. And it would be cheap. (Anyone know a multi-millionaire who could make it happen?)
It's high time the UN is made irrelevant and ridiculous, as opposed to functional, and accomplishing actual evil. It's time for countries like Sudan, where where human beings are publicly sold at slave auctions, is shunned, not placed on "human rights panel".

Manny said...

Expect violent protests from Manhattan's sex workers and drug dealers.

Jane said...

That is a speech I wish I had written!

When the United States withdraws (pays 25 percent of overall upkeep, plus 30 percent in peacekeeping and an untold amount for providing grunt work in the field, etc.), followed by Canada's withdrawal, then withdrawl of the disgruntled countries who want out from under the bondage of the European Union, the money-sucking United Nations will come unravelled virtually overnight.

Then maybe all of us can reclaim our respective constitutions.

I can hardly wait to hear that the despot dictators were indicted like the high-ranking Nazis and the 47-floor UN building has been renovated into a New York City monument that houses low-income families. (I think Frank's wish was for condos.)

Now the rapacious UN caliphs, dictators, potentates want to steal the lucrative Internet. You can see my posts "Big Brother Is Eyeing Take Over of Internet" And "Terrorists Law is War on Internet" after December 20 (if the Thought Police didn't get there first; it seems to be down at the moment) at:

http://christopherdiarmani.com/

Or if you haven't seen, IT News posted “WikiLeaks Sparks Push for Tighter Controls” on Dec. 17. John Hilvert’s full story, “UN Mulls Internet Regulation Options” and hundreds of luscious comments of like thinkers, can be read at:

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/242051,un-mulls-internet-regulation-options.aspx